linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vfs: keep inodes with page cache off the inode shrinker LRU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7c4c1459-60d5-24c8-6eb9-da299ead99ea@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:11:26 -0800
From:   santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, kernel-team@...com,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: keep inodes with page cache off the inode shrinker
 LRU

+Nishant, Tero

On 2/26/20 1:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 7:04 PM <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/13/20 8:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:50 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
>>> <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> The Keystone generations of SOCs have been used in different areas and
>> they will be used for long unless says otherwise.
>>
>> Apart from just split of lowmem and highmem, one of the peculiar thing
>> with Keystome family of SOCs is the DDR is addressable from two
>> addressing ranges. The lowmem address range is actually non-cached
>> range and the higher range is the cacheable.
> 
> I'm aware of Keystone's special physical memory layout, but for the
> discussion here, this is actually irrelevant for the discussion about
> highmem here, which is only about the way we map all or part of the
> available physical memory into the 4GB of virtual address space.
> 
> The far more important question is how much memory any users
> (in particular the subset that are going to update their kernels
> several years from now) actually have installed. Keystone-II is
> one of the rare 32-bit chips with fairly wide memory interfaces,
> having two 72-bit (with ECC) channels rather than the usual one
>   or two channels of 32-bit DDR3. This means a relatively cheap
> 4GB configuration using eight 256Mx16 chips is possible, or
> even a 8GB using sixteen or eighteen 512Mx8.
> 
> Do you have an estimate on how common these 4GB and 8GB
> configurations are in practice outside of the TI evaluation
> board?
> 
 From my TI memories, many K2 customers were going to install
more than 2G memory. Don't remember 8G, but 4G was the dominant
one afair. Will let Nishant/Tero elaborate latest on this.

regards,
Santosh