[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f480e36-f6ed-e72d-2e18-96617b37958e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:53:21 -0800
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, bp@...e.de,
hpa@...or.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, joro@...tes.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] x86/cpufeatures: Add flag to track whether MSR
IA32_FEAT_CTL is configured
On 2/26/2020 1:25 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Arguably, setup_pku() should be a little less heavy handed in updating
> cpufeatures for X86_FEATURE_OSPKE, but init_ia32_feat_ctl() should also be
> more robust.
>
Right.
>> But it looks like rdmsr is global and not tied to a given CPU anyways?
>
> For better or worse, the MSR is thread scoped.
>
Ahh. Definitely not obvious at a glance.
> I've reproduced the bug, should have a fix ready by EOD.
>
Nice, glad to hear it.
Thanks,
Jake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists