linux-kernel - [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove lock-final checking in lock.cat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200226032142.89424-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:21:40 +0800
From:   Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove lock-final checking in lock.cat

In commit 30b795df11a1 ("tools/memory-model: Improve mixed-access
checking in lock.cat"), we have added the checking to disallow any
normal memory access to lock variables, and this checking is stronger
than lock-final. So remove the lock-final checking as it's unnecessary
now.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
---
 tools/memory-model/lock.cat | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
index 6b52f365d73a..827a3646607c 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
+++ b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
@@ -54,9 +54,6 @@ flag ~empty LKR \ domain(lk-rmw) as unpaired-LKR
  *)
 empty ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [LKR]) \ (po-loc ; [UL] ; po-loc) as lock-nest
 
-(* The final value of a spinlock should not be tested *)
-flag ~empty [FW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as lock-final
-
 (*
  * Put lock operations in their appropriate classes, but leave UL out of W
  * until after the co relation has been generated.
-- 
2.25.0