[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db063edd-f1de-bbb4-3c8b-465904308aad@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:50:52 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] x86/entry: Move irq tracing to
prepare_exit_to_user_mode()
On 2/25/20 2:08 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> which again gets it out of the ASM code.
Why is this better than just sticking the tracing in
__prepare_exit_from_usermode() or just not splitting it in the first place?
(ISTM the real right solution is to make sure that it's okay for
trace_hardirqs_... to be safe even when rcuidle. But I may still be
missing something.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists