lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200226080757.GB3818@techsingularity.net>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 08:07:57 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Ivan Babrou <ivan@...udflare.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, page_alloc: Disable watermark boosting if THP is
 disabled at boot

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:32:24PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > Watermark boosting is intended to increase the success rate and reduce
> > latency of high-order allocations, particularly THP. If THP is disabled
> > at boot, then it makes sense to disable watermark boosting as well. While
> > there are other high-order allocations that potentially benefit, they
> > are relatively rare.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> > ---
> >  mm/huge_memory.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index b08b199f9a11..565bb9973ff8 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ static int __init setup_transparent_hugepage(char *str)
> >  			  &transparent_hugepage_flags);
> >  		clear_bit(TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_REQ_MADV_FLAG,
> >  			  &transparent_hugepage_flags);
> > +		disable_watermark_boosting();
> >  		ret = 1;
> >  	}
> >  out:
> 
> Seems like watermark boosting can help prevent fragmentation so it 
> benefits all hugepage sized allocations for the long term and that would 
> include dynamic provisioning of hugetlb memory or hugetlb overcommit?

Yes but it's very rare to hear of cases where hugetlb is dynamically
provisioned or overcommitted once THP existed and stopped stalling the
system excessively. I'm happy enough to drop this patch because I'm not
relying on it in the context of this bug.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ