[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <158270760109.18966.17040884471473886413.stgit@devnote2>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:00:01 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH -tip V4 4/4] kprobes: Remove redundant arch_disarm_kprobe() call
Fix to remove redundant arch_disarm_kprobe() call in
force_unoptimize_kprobe(). This arch_disarm_kprobe()
will be invoked if the kprobe is optimized but disabled,
but that means the kprobe (optprobe) is unused (and
unoptimized) state.
In that case, unoptimize_kprobe() puts it in freeing_list
and kprobe_optimizer (do_unoptimize_kprobes()) automatically
disarm it. Thus this arch_disarm_kprobe() is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 6d76a6e3e1a5..627fc1b7011a 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -675,8 +675,6 @@ static void force_unoptimize_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
arch_unoptimize_kprobe(op);
op->kp.flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED;
- if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp))
- arch_disarm_kprobe(&op->kp);
}
/* Unoptimize a kprobe if p is optimized */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists