[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4929660-21ff-e394-37a0-d72b67a3770a@isovalent.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:17:21 +0000
From: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@...nsuse.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/5] bpftool: Make probes which emit dmesg
warnings optional
2020-02-25 20:44 UTC+0100 ~ Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@...nsuse.org>
> Feature probes in bpftool related to bpf_probe_write_user and
> bpf_trace_printk helpers emit dmesg warnings which might be confusing
> for people running bpftool on production environments. This patch series
> addresses that by filtering them out by default and introducing the new
> positional argument "full" which enables all available probes.
>
> The main motivation behind those changes is ability the fact that some
> probes (for example those related to "trace" or "write_user" helpers)
> emit dmesg messages which might be confusing for people who are running
> on production environments. For details see the Cilium issue[0].
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Do not expose regex filters to users, keep filtering logic internal,
> expose only the "full" option for including probes which emit dmesg
> warnings.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Do not use regex for filtering out probes, use function IDs directly.
> - Fix bash completion - in v2 only "prefix" was proposed after "macros",
> "dev" and "kernel" were not.
> - Rephrase the man page paragraph, highlight helper function names.
> - Remove tests which parse the plain output of bpftool (except the
> header/macros test), focus on testing JSON output instead.
> - Add test which compares the output with and without "full" option.
>
> [0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/issues/10048
>
> Michal Rostecki (5):
> bpftool: Move out sections to separate functions
> bpftool: Make probes which emit dmesg warnings optional
> bpftool: Update documentation of "bpftool feature" command
> bpftool: Update bash completion for "bpftool feature" command
> selftests/bpf: Add test for "bpftool feature" command
>
> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-feature.rst | 19 +-
> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 3 +-
> tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 283 +++++++++++-------
> tools/testing/selftests/.gitignore | 5 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 3 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool.py | 179 +++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool.sh | 5 +
> 7 files changed, 374 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool.py
> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool.sh
>
This version looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
(Please keep Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags between versions if there are no
significant changes, here for patch 1.)
That's a lot of tests now that we don't have the regex and filtering is
very straightforward, but it does not hurt. I checked and they all pass
on my system.
Thanks,
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists