linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200226112027.GA4136@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:20:27 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
        Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
        "H . J . Lu " <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
        Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program
 properties

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 09:49:35PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:

> Both BTI and SHSTK depend on this. If BTI doesn't land soon, can this
> and patch 2 land separately? I don't like seeing the older version in
> the SHSTK series -- I worry there will be confusion and the BTI version
> (which is more up to date) will get missed.

Please.

> What's left to land BTI support?

As far as I'm aware it's basically good to go, there's been no really
substantial feedback in the months I've been pushing it, just fairly
trivial stuff and rebases - it's going to need another resend for your
comment just now about moving a hunk forward to a different patch for
example.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)