[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB66385DDED7C654AE2181E08E89EA0@VE1PR04MB6638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:15:23 +0000
From: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
To: André Draszik <git@...red.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>,
Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 6/6] Input: snvs_pwrkey - only IRQ_HANDLED for our own
events
On 2020/02/26 André Draszik <git@...red.net> wrote:
> The snvs_pwrkey shares the SNVS LPSR status register with the snvs_rtc.
>
> This driver here should only return IRQ_HANDLED if the status register
> indicates that the event we're handling in the irq handler was genuinely
> intended for this driver. Otheriwse the interrupt subsystem will assume the
> interrupt was handled successfully even though it wasn't at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@...red.net>
> Cc: "Horia Geantă" <horia.geanta@....com>
> Cc: Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> Cc: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> Cc: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
>
> ---
> v2:
> * no changes
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
> b/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
> index 382d2ae82c9b..980867886b34 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_snvs_pwrkey_interrupt(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
> clk_enable(pdata->clk);
>
> regmap_read(pdata->snvs, SNVS_LPSR_REG, &lp_status);
> - if (lp_status & SNVS_LPSR_SPO) {
> + lp_status &= SNVS_LPSR_SPO;
> +
> + if (lp_status) {
> if (pdata->minor_rev == 0) {
> /*
> * The first generation i.MX[6|7] SoCs only send an @@ -98,14
> +100,14 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_snvs_pwrkey_interrupt(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
> mod_timer(&pdata->check_timer,
> jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(DEBOUNCE_TIME));
> }
> - }
>
> - /* clear SPO status */
> - regmap_write(pdata->snvs, SNVS_LPSR_REG, SNVS_LPSR_SPO);
> + /* clear SPO status */
> + regmap_write(pdata->snvs, SNVS_LPSR_REG, SNVS_LPSR_SPO);
But irq storm will come in once there is other interrupt triggered as unexpected,
although I never met it before. Could we drop this patch now? Others are ok for me.
Reviewed-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp>
> + }
>
> clk_disable(pdata->clk);
>
> - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + return lp_status ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
> static void imx_snvs_pwrkey_act(void *pdata)
> --
> 2.23.0.rc1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists