linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/llvm: add documentation on building w/ Clang/LLVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:38:38 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/llvm: add documentation on building w/ Clang/LLVM

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:26 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:31 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:02 AM Nick Desaulniers
> > <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Added to kbuild documentation. Provides more official info on building
> > > kernels with Clang and LLVM than our wiki.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes V1 -> V2:
> > > * s/On going/ongoing/
> > > * add Randy's Suggested-by
> >
> >
> > I do not understand this tag update.
> >
> > As far as I saw the review process,
> > I do not think Randy deserves to have Suggested-by
> > because he just pointed out a typo (on going -> ongoing) :
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11401189/#23179575
> >
> > (or, was there off-line activity I had missed?)
> >
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> I got some credits from Nick for a review by seeing a typo - not on a
> review of the code - and H. Peter Anvin asked why.
>
> I am not sure what is here the correct credit to give.
> Depends a "Reviewed-by" and/or "Suggested-by" on a technical review?



Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

  13) Using Reported-by:, Tested-by:, Reviewed-by:, Suggested-by: and Fixes:

is a helpful guideline.







-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada