[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200226103409.9036c0384866979025232c6c@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:34:09 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootconfig: Fix CONFIG_BOOTTIME_TRACING dependency
issue
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:59:25 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 2/25/20 9:53 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:49:25 -0800
> > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> >>> Fixes: d8a953ddde5e ("bootconfig: Set CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG=n by default")
> >>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm no fan of "select", but this does fix the kconfig warnings and
> >> build errors that I have reported. Thanks.
> >
> > I'm not big on select either, but this is fine (I'm running it through my
> > tests now).
> >
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> # build-tested
> >
> > Is it OK if I change this to "Tested-by:"?
>
> Yes, as long as someone doesn't read (interpret) that as runtime-tested-by. :)
Thanks Randy and Steve!
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists