linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: update dpi supported chips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1582681211.16944.2.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:40:11 +0800
From:   CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
CC:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>, <cawa.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>, <stonea168@....com>,
        <huijuan.xie@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: update dpi
 supported chips

On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 11:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:40:52 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> > Add descriptions about supported chips, including MT2701 & MT8173 &
> > mt8183
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.txt        | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

I think this version is the same as v3 [1] which has been reviewed by
Rob, so I applied this patch i mediatek-drm-next-5.7 [2], thanks.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10901971/
[2]
https://github.com/ckhu-mediatek/linux.git-tags/commits/mediatek-drm-next-5.7

Regards,
CK