linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] AT8031 PHY timestamping support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200226142931.GA1651@localhost>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:29:31 -0800
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] AT8031 PHY timestamping support

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:30:48PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> But then there would need to be such a hardware pin, correct? Unless
> you'd misuse the INT# for it. Also, why should the PHY then have a PHC
> which can be adjusted.

I see.  Oh well.  I'll just have to remember the AR8031 on my list of "ptp
hardware to be avoided".

:(

Richard