linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add rtc support for rn5t618 mfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200226144629.GP3494@dell>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:46:29 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...puter.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, stefan@...er.ch, b.galvani@...il.com,
        phh@....me,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add rtc support for rn5t618 mfd

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> > Am 20.12.2019 um 13:24 schrieb Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>:
> > 
> > In the variant RC5T619 the mfd has an RTC. This patchset adds
> > support for it. To do so it adds the missing register defines in 
> > rn5t618.h and general irq handling for that.
> > It seems that the irq definitions are the same except missing RTC
> > but due to missing ability to test that I do not add them here.
> > 
> > The rtc driver itself is based on 
> > https://github.com/kobolabs/Kobo-Reader/blob/master/hw/imx6sll-clara/kernel.tar.bz2
> > but heavily reworked.
> > 
> > It was tested on the Kobo Clara HD.
> > 
> > For cleaning up there is a separate off-topic patch:
> > mfd: rn5t618: cleanup i2c_device_id
> > 
> > Changes in v5:
> > - static rn5t618_irq_init
> > - PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE
> > - added some Acked-Bys
> > 
> > Changes in v4:
> > - use macros for IRQ definitions
> > - merge rn5t618-core.c and rn5t618-irq.c
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > - alignment cleanup
> > - output cleanup, remove useless toggling of alarm flag in rtc probe
> > - updated bindings description, so patch 1/5 becomes 2/6 and so on
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - no dead code in irq code
> > - various improvements and cleanups in rtc driver itself
> > 
> > Andreas Kemnade (5):
> >  dt-bindings: mfd: rn5t618: Document optional property interrupts
> >  mfd: rn5t618: add IRQ support
> >  mfd: rn5t618: add RTC related registers
> >  mfd: rn5t618: add more subdevices
> >  rtc: rc5t619: add ricoh rc5t619 RTC driver
> 
> what has happened to this series?
> It looks like something got lost so that it has not yet arrived in linux-next.

It won't show up in -next until it's been reviewed/applied.

If it's not been touched for a few weeks/months, assume it's slipped
through the gaps, collect all of the *-bys and submit a [RESEND].

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog