linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/llvm: add documentation on building w/ Clang/LLVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d70e7d82-4f08-0a30-e54b-8b0f225145df@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:45:39 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/llvm: add documentation on building w/
 Clang/LLVM

On 2/26/20 3:30 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:02 AM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Added to kbuild documentation. Provides more official info on building
>> kernels with Clang and LLVM than our wiki.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> Changes V1 -> V2:
>> * s/On going/ongoing/
>> * add Randy's Suggested-by
> 
> 
> I do not understand this tag update.
> 
> As far as I saw the review process,
> I do not think Randy deserves to have Suggested-by
> because he just pointed out a typo (on going -> ongoing) :

I agree.

> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11401189/#23179575
> 
> (or, was there off-line activity I had missed?)


-- 
~Randy