linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mfd: rn5t618: add ADC subdevice for RC5T619

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200226174914.047667d5@kemnade.info>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:49:14 +0100
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
        b.galvani@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        phh@....me, stefan@...er.ch, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org,
        jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mfd: rn5t618: add ADC subdevice for RC5T619

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:40:55 +0000
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> 
> > This adds a subdevice for the ADC in the RC5T619
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> > ---
> > depends on:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191220122416.31881-1-andreas@kemnade.info/
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > re-added it to the series because of
> > "Oh, it looks like there was a conflict.  Could you collect any Acks
> > (including mine) rebase and resend please?"  
> 
> Looks like there is still a conflict.  Sure, it's not a complicated
> fix, but that's beside the point.  What tree is this set based on?
> 
It must be applied on top of my rc5t619 rtc series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191220122416.31881-1-andreas@kemnade.info/

I expected it to make it into 5.6 and when I first sent the RTC series
 (in October) I had no idea when I will continue with other stuff.

That is why I sent this ADC series separately, also to give the IIO
maintainer plenty of time to review. 

Do you want me to resend all that pending stuff together in one series?
I have little experience with this multi-subdevice process.

Regards,
Andreas

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped