| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:02:38 -0500
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)"
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] loop: Use worker per cgroup instead of kworker
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 17:17 -0500, Dan Schatzberg wrote:
> Existing uses of loop device may have multiple cgroups reading/writing
> to the same device. Simply charging resources for I/O to the backing
> file could result in priority inversion where one cgroup gets
> synchronously blocked, holding up all other I/O to the loop device.
>
> In order to avoid this priority inversion, we use a single workqueue
> where each work item is a "struct loop_worker" which contains a queue of
> struct loop_cmds to issue. The loop device maintains a tree mapping blk
> css_id -> loop_worker. This allows each cgroup to independently make
> forward progress issuing I/O to the backing file.
>
> There is also a single queue for I/O associated with the rootcg which
> can be used in cases of extreme memory shortage where we cannot allocate
> a loop_worker.
>
> The locking for the tree and queues is fairly heavy handed - we acquire
> the per-loop-device spinlock any time either is accessed. The existing
> implementation serializes all I/O through a single thread anyways, so I
> don't believe this is any worse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
The locking in loop_free_idle_workers() will trigger this with sysfs reading,
[ 7080.047167] LTP: starting read_all_sys (read_all -d /sys -q -r 10)
[ 7239.842276] cpufreq transition table exceeds PAGE_SIZE. Disabling
[ 7247.054961] =====================================================
[ 7247.054971] WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
[ 7247.054983] 5.6.0-rc3-next-20200226 #2 Tainted: G O
[ 7247.054992] -----------------------------------------------------
[ 7247.055002] read_all/8513 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
[ 7247.055014] c0000006844864c8 (&fs->seq){+.+.}, at: file_path+0x24/0x40
[ 7247.055041]
and this task is already holding:
[ 7247.055061] c0002006bab8b928 (&(&lo->lo_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at:
loop_attr_do_show_backing_file+0x3c/0x120 [loop]
[ 7247.055078] which would create a new lock dependency:
[ 7247.055105] (&(&lo->lo_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fs->seq){+.+.}
[ 7247.055125]
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
[ 7247.055155] (&(&lo->lo_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[ 7247.055156]
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at:
[ 7247.055196] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.055221] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x68/0x90
[ 7247.055230] loop_free_idle_workers+0x44/0x3f0 [loop]
[ 7247.055242] call_timer_fn+0x110/0x5f0
[ 7247.055260] run_timer_softirq+0x8f8/0x9f0
[ 7247.055278] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x8c8
[ 7247.055288] irq_exit+0x16c/0x1d0
[ 7247.055298] timer_interrupt+0x1f0/0x680
[ 7247.055308] decrementer_common+0x124/0x130
[ 7247.055328] arch_local_irq_restore.part.8+0x34/0x90
[ 7247.055352] cpuidle_enter_state+0x11c/0x8f0
[ 7247.055361] cpuidle_enter+0x50/0x70
[ 7247.055389] call_cpuidle+0x4c/0x90
[ 7247.055398] do_idle+0x378/0x470
[ 7247.055414] cpu_startup_entry+0x3c/0x40
[ 7247.055442] start_secondary+0x7a8/0xa80
[ 7247.055461] start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
[ 7247.055478]
to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
[ 7247.055506] (&fs->seq){+.+.}
[ 7247.055507]
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
[ 7247.055541] ...
[ 7247.055542] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.055577] set_fs_pwd+0x98/0x140
[ 7247.055593] ksys_chdir+0x8c/0x100
[ 7247.055611] devtmpfsd+0xac/0xe0
[ 7247.055629] kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[ 7247.055645] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
[ 7247.055663]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 7247.055685] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 7247.055695] CPU0 CPU1
[ 7247.055712] ---- ----
[ 7247.055719] lock(&fs->seq);
[ 7247.055748] local_irq_disable();
[ 7247.055776] lock(&(&lo->lo_lock)->rlock);
[ 7247.055805] lock(&fs->seq);
[ 7247.055825] <Interrupt>
[ 7247.055840] lock(&(&lo->lo_lock)->rlock);
[ 7247.055867]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 7247.055896] 5 locks held by read_all/8513:
[ 7247.055913] #0: c000001afc46d708 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x60/0x620
[ 7247.055944] #1: c000000f6ce00e80 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at:
kernfs_seq_start+0x40/0x130
[ 7247.055981] #2: c0002011b81e0010 (kn->count#685){.+.+}, at:
kernfs_seq_start+0x4c/0x130
[ 7247.056013] #3: c0002006bab8b928 (&(&lo->lo_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at:
loop_attr_do_show_backing_file+0x3c/0x120 [loop]
[ 7247.056048] #4: c000000001500888 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at:
d_path+0xa0/0x3f0
[ 7247.056072]
the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding
lock:
[ 7247.056104] -> (&(&lo->lo_lock)->rlock){..-.} ops: 196198 {
[ 7247.056144] IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
[ 7247.056161] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.056180] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x68/0x90
[ 7247.056208] loop_free_idle_workers+0x44/0x3f0 [loop]
[ 7247.056238] call_timer_fn+0x110/0x5f0
[ 7247.056271] run_timer_softirq+0x8f8/0x9f0
[ 7247.056290] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x8c8
[ 7247.056318] irq_exit+0x16c/0x1d0
[ 7247.056337] timer_interrupt+0x1f0/0x680
[ 7247.056366] decrementer_common+0x124/0x130
[ 7247.056394] arch_local_irq_restore.part.8+0x34/0x90
[ 7247.056432] cpuidle_enter_state+0x11c/0x8f0
[ 7247.056460] cpuidle_enter+0x50/0x70
[ 7247.056480] call_cpuidle+0x4c/0x90
[ 7247.056498] do_idle+0x378/0x470
[ 7247.056516] cpu_startup_entry+0x3c/0x40
[ 7247.056535] start_secondary+0x7a8/0xa80
[ 7247.056554] start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
[ 7247.056572] INITIAL USE at:
[ 7247.056589] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.056618] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x68/0x90
[ 7247.056671] loop_queue_rq+0xf4/0x540 [loop]
[ 7247.056737] __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0x1ac/0x2e0
[ 7247.056850] blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0x64/0xb0
[ 7247.056924] blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly+0x90/0x140
[ 7247.056988] blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x1c0/0x4b0
[ 7247.057070] blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x1d0/0x4b0
[ 7247.057155] blk_flush_plug_list+0x148/0x1a0
[ 7247.057221] blk_finish_plug+0x50/0x6c
[ 7247.057285] read_pages+0xac/0x320
[ 7247.057344] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x198/0x350
[ 7247.057428] force_page_cache_readahead+0xcc/0x1b0
[ 7247.057505] generic_file_buffered_read+0x7d4/0xdd0
[ 7247.057577] blkdev_read_iter+0x50/0x80
[ 7247.057658] new_sync_read+0x15c/0x1f0
[ 7247.057723] vfs_read+0xac/0x170
[ 7247.057786] ksys_read+0x7c/0x140
[ 7247.057856] system_call+0x5c/0x68
[ 7247.057902] }
[ 7247.057935] ... key at: [<c00800000fa6bbc8>]
__key.50783+0x0/0xffffffffffffc9b8 [loop]
[ 7247.058028] ... acquired at:
[ 7247.058074] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.058126] d_path+0x194/0x3f0
[ 7247.058174] file_path+0x24/0x40
[ 7247.058225] loop_attr_do_show_backing_file+0x5c/0x120 [loop]
[ 7247.058305] dev_attr_show+0x44/0xb0
[ 7247.058354] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xbc/0x1d0
[ 7247.058421] kernfs_seq_show+0x44/0x60
[ 7247.058458] seq_read+0x1c4/0x620
[ 7247.058504] kernfs_fop_read+0x40/0x2b0
[ 7247.058559] __vfs_read+0x3c/0x70
[ 7247.058607] vfs_read+0xac/0x170
[ 7247.058659] ksys_read+0x7c/0x140
[ 7247.058722] system_call+0x5c/0x68
[ 7247.058778]
the dependencies between the lock to be acquired
[ 7247.058779] and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
[ 7247.058924] -> (&fs->seq){+.+.} ops: 22599070 {
[ 7247.058992] HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
[ 7247.059043] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.059108] set_fs_pwd+0x98/0x140
[ 7247.059179] ksys_chdir+0x8c/0x100
[ 7247.059262] devtmpfsd+0xac/0xe0
[ 7247.059318] kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[ 7247.059369] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
[ 7247.059453] SOFTIRQ-ON-W at:
[ 7247.059498] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.059545] set_fs_pwd+0x98/0x140
[ 7247.059614] ksys_chdir+0x8c/0x100
[ 7247.059675] devtmpfsd+0xac/0xe0
[ 7247.059745] kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[ 7247.059804] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
[ 7247.059884] INITIAL USE at:
[ 7247.059929] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.059994] set_root+0x118/0x220
[ 7247.060066] nd_jump_root+0x100/0x170
[ 7247.060111] path_init+0x640/0x7b0
[ 7247.060193] path_lookupat+0x3c/0x1b0
[ 7247.060257] filename_lookup.part.60+0xa0/0x170
[ 7247.060323] do_mount+0xa8/0xc00
[ 7247.060381] devtmpfsd+0x94/0xe0
[ 7247.060436] kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[ 7247.060481] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
[ 7247.060563] }
[ 7247.060597] ... key at: [<c00000000509c9e8>] __key.27999+0x0/0x10
[ 7247.060676] ... acquired at:
[ 7247.060723] lock_acquire+0x130/0x360
[ 7247.060768] d_path+0x194/0x3f0
[ 7247.060810] file_path+0x24/0x40
[ 7247.060869] loop_attr_do_show_backing_file+0x5c/0x120 [loop]
[ 7247.060931] dev_attr_show+0x44/0xb0
[ 7247.060988] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xbc/0x1d0
[ 7247.061042] kernfs_seq_show+0x44/0x60
[ 7247.061116] seq_read+0x1c4/0x620
[ 7247.061155] kernfs_fop_read+0x40/0x2b0
[ 7247.061204] __vfs_read+0x3c/0x70
[ 7247.061249] vfs_read+0xac/0x170
[ 7247.061292] ksys_read+0x7c/0x140
[ 7247.061341] system_call+0x5c/0x68
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/block/loop.h | 11 ++-
> 2 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 739b372a5112..a9b05cacc393 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@
> #include <linux/writeback.h>
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> #include <linux/highmem.h>
> -#include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/splice.h>
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> @@ -83,6 +82,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> +#define LOOP_IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT (60 * HZ)
> +
> static DEFINE_IDR(loop_index_idr);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_ctl_mutex);
>
> @@ -891,27 +892,100 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
>
> static void loop_unprepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> - kthread_flush_worker(&lo->worker);
> - kthread_stop(lo->worker_task);
> -}
> -
> -static int loop_kthread_worker_fn(void *worker_ptr)
> -{
> - current->flags |= PF_LESS_THROTTLE | PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO;
> - return kthread_worker_fn(worker_ptr);
> + destroy_workqueue(lo->workqueue);
> }
>
> static int loop_prepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> - kthread_init_worker(&lo->worker);
> - lo->worker_task = kthread_run(loop_kthread_worker_fn,
> - &lo->worker, "loop%d", lo->lo_number);
> - if (IS_ERR(lo->worker_task))
> + lo->workqueue = alloc_workqueue("loop%d",
> + WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_FREEZABLE |
> + WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
> + lo->lo_number);
> + if (IS_ERR(lo->workqueue))
> return -ENOMEM;
> - set_user_nice(lo->worker_task, MIN_NICE);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> +struct loop_worker {
> + struct rb_node rb_node;
> + struct work_struct work;
> + struct list_head cmd_list;
> + struct list_head idle_list;
> + struct loop_device *lo;
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> + unsigned long last_ran_at;
> +};
> +
> +static void loop_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
> +static void loop_rootcg_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
> +static void loop_free_idle_workers(struct timer_list *timer);
> +
> +static void loop_queue_work(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> + struct rb_node **node = &(lo->worker_tree.rb_node), *parent = NULL;
> + struct loop_worker *cur_worker, *worker = NULL;
> + struct work_struct *work;
> + struct list_head *cmd_list;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> +
> + if (!cmd->css)
> + goto queue_work;
> +
> + node = &lo->worker_tree.rb_node;
> +
> + while (*node) {
> + parent = *node;
> + cur_worker = container_of(*node, struct loop_worker, rb_node);
> + if (cur_worker->css == cmd->css) {
> + worker = cur_worker;
> + break;
> + } else if ((long)cur_worker->css < (long)cmd->css) {
> + node = &(*node)->rb_left;
> + } else {
> + node = &(*node)->rb_right;
> + }
> + }
> + if (worker)
> + goto queue_work;
> +
> + worker = kzalloc(sizeof(struct loop_worker), GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
> + /*
> + * In the event we cannot allocate a worker, just queue on the
> + * rootcg worker
> + */
> + if (!worker)
> + goto queue_work;
> +
> + worker->css = cmd->css;
> + css_get(worker->css);
> + INIT_WORK(&worker->work, loop_workfn);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->cmd_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->idle_list);
> + worker->lo = lo;
> + rb_link_node(&worker->rb_node, parent, node);
> + rb_insert_color(&worker->rb_node, &lo->worker_tree);
> +queue_work:
> + if (worker) {
> + /*
> + * We need to remove from the idle list here while
> + * holding the lock so that the idle timer doesn't
> + * free the worker
> + */
> + if (!list_empty(&worker->idle_list))
> + list_del_init(&worker->idle_list);
> + work = &worker->work;
> + cmd_list = &worker->cmd_list;
> + } else {
> + work = &lo->rootcg_work;
> + cmd_list = &lo->rootcg_cmd_list;
> + }
> + list_add_tail(&cmd->list_entry, cmd_list);
> + queue_work(lo->workqueue, work);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> +}
> +
> static void loop_update_rotational(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
> @@ -993,6 +1067,12 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
>
> set_device_ro(bdev, (lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY) != 0);
>
> + INIT_WORK(&lo->rootcg_work, loop_rootcg_workfn);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->rootcg_cmd_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->idle_worker_list);
> + lo->worker_tree = RB_ROOT;
> + timer_setup(&lo->timer, loop_free_idle_workers,
> + TIMER_DEFERRABLE);
> lo->use_dio = false;
> lo->lo_device = bdev;
> lo->lo_flags = lo_flags;
> @@ -1101,6 +1181,7 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
> int err = 0;
> bool partscan = false;
> int lo_number;
> + struct loop_worker *pos, *worker;
>
> mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lo->lo_state != Lo_rundown)) {
> @@ -1117,9 +1198,28 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
> /* freeze request queue during the transition */
> blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
>
> + /*
> + * Ordering here is a bit tricky:
> + *
> + * 1) flush/destroy workqueue without lock held so outstanding
> + * I/O is issued and all active workers go idle
> + *
> + * 2) Grab lock, free all idle workers
> + *
> + * 3) unlock, del_timer_sync so if timer raced it will be a no-op
> + */
> + loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
> spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> lo->lo_backing_file = NULL;
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(worker, pos, &lo->idle_worker_list,
> + idle_list) {
> + list_del(&worker->idle_list);
> + rb_erase(&worker->rb_node, &lo->worker_tree);
> + css_put(worker->css);
> + kfree(worker);
> + }
> spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> + del_timer_sync(&lo->timer);
>
> loop_release_xfer(lo);
> lo->transfer = NULL;
> @@ -1154,7 +1254,6 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
>
> partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev;
> lo_number = lo->lo_number;
> - loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
> out_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
> if (partscan) {
> @@ -1932,7 +2031,7 @@ static blk_status_t loop_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> } else
> #endif
> cmd->css = NULL;
> - kthread_queue_work(&lo->worker, &cmd->work);
> + loop_queue_work(lo, cmd);
>
> return BLK_STS_OK;
> }
> @@ -1958,26 +2057,82 @@ static void loop_handle_cmd(struct loop_cmd *cmd)
> }
> }
>
> -static void loop_queue_work(struct kthread_work *work)
> +static void loop_set_timer(struct loop_device *lo)
> +{
> + timer_reduce(&lo->timer, jiffies + LOOP_IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT);
> +}
> +
> +static void loop_process_work(struct loop_worker *worker,
> + struct list_head *cmd_list, struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> - struct loop_cmd *cmd =
> - container_of(work, struct loop_cmd, work);
> + int orig_flags = current->flags;
> + struct loop_cmd *cmd;
>
> - loop_handle_cmd(cmd);
> + current->flags |= PF_LESS_THROTTLE | PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO;
> + spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> + while (!list_empty(cmd_list)) {
> + cmd = container_of(
> + cmd_list->next, struct loop_cmd, list_entry);
> + list_del(cmd_list->next);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> +
> + loop_handle_cmd(cmd);
> + cond_resched();
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We only add to the idle list if there are no pending cmds
> + * *and* the worker will not run again which ensures that it
> + * is safe to free any worker on the idle list
> + */
> + if (worker && !work_pending(&worker->work)) {
> + worker->last_ran_at = jiffies;
> + list_add_tail(&worker->idle_list, &lo->idle_worker_list);
> + loop_set_timer(lo);
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> + current->flags = orig_flags;
> }
>
> -static int loop_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *rq,
> - unsigned int hctx_idx, unsigned int numa_node)
> +static void loop_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> - struct loop_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> + struct loop_worker *worker =
> + container_of(work, struct loop_worker, work);
> + loop_process_work(worker, &worker->cmd_list, worker->lo);
> +}
>
> - kthread_init_work(&cmd->work, loop_queue_work);
> - return 0;
> +static void loop_rootcg_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct loop_device *lo =
> + container_of(work, struct loop_device, rootcg_work);
> + loop_process_work(NULL, &lo->rootcg_cmd_list, lo);
> +}
> +
> +static void loop_free_idle_workers(struct timer_list *timer)
> +{
> + struct loop_device *lo = container_of(timer, struct loop_device, timer);
> + struct loop_worker *pos, *worker;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(worker, pos, &lo->idle_worker_list,
> + idle_list) {
> + if (time_is_after_jiffies(worker->last_ran_at +
> + LOOP_IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT))
> + break;
> + list_del(&worker->idle_list);
> + rb_erase(&worker->rb_node, &lo->worker_tree);
> + css_put(worker->css);
> + kfree(worker);
> + }
> + if (!list_empty(&lo->idle_worker_list))
> + loop_set_timer(lo);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> }
>
> static const struct blk_mq_ops loop_mq_ops = {
> .queue_rq = loop_queue_rq,
> - .init_request = loop_init_request,
> .complete = lo_complete_rq,
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.h b/drivers/block/loop.h
> index af75a5ee4094..87fd0e372227 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
> #include <linux/blk-mq.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> -#include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/loop.h>
>
> /* Possible states of device */
> @@ -54,8 +53,12 @@ struct loop_device {
>
> spinlock_t lo_lock;
> int lo_state;
> - struct kthread_worker worker;
> - struct task_struct *worker_task;
> + struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
> + struct work_struct rootcg_work;
> + struct list_head rootcg_cmd_list;
> + struct list_head idle_worker_list;
> + struct rb_root worker_tree;
> + struct timer_list timer;
> bool use_dio;
> bool sysfs_inited;
>
> @@ -65,7 +68,7 @@ struct loop_device {
> };
>
> struct loop_cmd {
> - struct kthread_work work;
> + struct list_head list_entry;
> bool use_aio; /* use AIO interface to handle I/O */
> atomic_t ref; /* only for aio */
> long ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists