[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200227132229.500706144@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:37:39 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+65c6c92d04304d0a8efc@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+e60ddfa48717579799dd@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 91/97] ALSA: seq: Avoid concurrent access to queue flags
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
commit bb51e669fa49feb5904f452b2991b240ef31bc97 upstream.
The queue flags are represented in bit fields and the concurrent
access may result in unexpected results. Although the current code
should be mostly OK as it's only reading a field while writing other
fields as KCSAN reported, it's safer to cover both with a proper
spinlock protection.
This patch fixes the possible concurrent read by protecting with
q->owner_lock. Also the queue owner field is protected as well since
it's the field to be protected by the lock itself.
Reported-by: syzbot+65c6c92d04304d0a8efc@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+e60ddfa48717579799dd@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214111316.26939-2-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c
+++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c
@@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ int snd_seq_queue_check_access(int queue
int snd_seq_queue_set_owner(int queueid, int client, int locked)
{
struct snd_seq_queue *q = queueptr(queueid);
+ unsigned long flags;
if (q == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -414,8 +415,10 @@ int snd_seq_queue_set_owner(int queueid,
return -EPERM;
}
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->owner_lock, flags);
q->locked = locked ? 1 : 0;
q->owner = client;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->owner_lock, flags);
queue_access_unlock(q);
queuefree(q);
@@ -552,15 +555,17 @@ void snd_seq_queue_client_termination(in
unsigned long flags;
int i;
struct snd_seq_queue *q;
+ bool matched;
for (i = 0; i < SNDRV_SEQ_MAX_QUEUES; i++) {
if ((q = queueptr(i)) == NULL)
continue;
spin_lock_irqsave(&q->owner_lock, flags);
- if (q->owner == client)
+ matched = (q->owner == client);
+ if (matched)
q->klocked = 1;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->owner_lock, flags);
- if (q->owner == client) {
+ if (matched) {
if (q->timer->running)
snd_seq_timer_stop(q->timer);
snd_seq_timer_reset(q->timer);
@@ -752,6 +757,8 @@ void snd_seq_info_queues_read(struct snd
int i, bpm;
struct snd_seq_queue *q;
struct snd_seq_timer *tmr;
+ bool locked;
+ int owner;
for (i = 0; i < SNDRV_SEQ_MAX_QUEUES; i++) {
if ((q = queueptr(i)) == NULL)
@@ -763,9 +770,14 @@ void snd_seq_info_queues_read(struct snd
else
bpm = 0;
+ spin_lock_irq(&q->owner_lock);
+ locked = q->locked;
+ owner = q->owner;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&q->owner_lock);
+
snd_iprintf(buffer, "queue %d: [%s]\n", q->queue, q->name);
- snd_iprintf(buffer, "owned by client : %d\n", q->owner);
- snd_iprintf(buffer, "lock status : %s\n", q->locked ? "Locked" : "Free");
+ snd_iprintf(buffer, "owned by client : %d\n", owner);
+ snd_iprintf(buffer, "lock status : %s\n", locked ? "Locked" : "Free");
snd_iprintf(buffer, "queued time events : %d\n", snd_seq_prioq_avail(q->timeq));
snd_iprintf(buffer, "queued tick events : %d\n", snd_seq_prioq_avail(q->tickq));
snd_iprintf(buffer, "timer state : %s\n", tmr->running ? "Running" : "Stopped");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists