[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200227132245.939316844@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:37:06 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.5 089/150] ext4: fix a data race in EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
commit 35df4299a6487f323b0aca120ea3f485dfee2ae3 upstream.
EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize could be accessed concurrently as noticed by
KCSAN,
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_write_end [ext4] / ext4_writepages [ext4]
write to 0xffff91c6713b00f8 of 8 bytes by task 49268 on cpu 127:
ext4_write_end+0x4e3/0x750 [ext4]
ext4_update_i_disksize at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3032
(inlined by) ext4_update_inode_size at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3046
(inlined by) ext4_write_end at fs/ext4/inode.c:1287
generic_perform_write+0x208/0x2a0
ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
__vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
vfs_write+0x103/0x260
ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
__x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb47
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
read to 0xffff91c6713b00f8 of 8 bytes by task 24872 on cpu 37:
ext4_writepages+0x10ac/0x1d00 [ext4]
mpage_map_and_submit_extent at fs/ext4/inode.c:2468
(inlined by) ext4_writepages at fs/ext4/inode.c:2772
do_writepages+0x5e/0x130
__writeback_single_inode+0xeb/0xb20
writeback_sb_inodes+0x429/0x900
__writeback_inodes_wb+0xc4/0x150
wb_writeback+0x4bd/0x870
wb_workfn+0x6b4/0x960
process_one_work+0x54c/0xbe0
worker_thread+0x80/0x650
kthread+0x1e0/0x200
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 37 PID: 24872 Comm: kworker/u261:2 Tainted: G W O L 5.5.0-next-20200204+ #5
Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0)
Since only the read is operating as lockless (outside of the
"i_data_sem"), load tearing could introduce a logic bug. Fix it by
adding READ_ONCE() for the read and WRITE_ONCE() for the write.
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1581085751-31793-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -2972,7 +2972,7 @@ static inline void ext4_update_i_disksiz
!inode_is_locked(inode));
down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
if (newsize > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
- EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = newsize;
+ WRITE_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize, newsize);
up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
}
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2466,7 +2466,7 @@ update_disksize:
* truncate are avoided by checking i_size under i_data_sem.
*/
disksize = ((loff_t)mpd->first_page) << PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (disksize > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize) {
+ if (disksize > READ_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)) {
int err2;
loff_t i_size;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists