[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200227151216.GA18240@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:12:16 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, enric.balletbo@...labora.com,
bleung@...omium.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec Type C port driver
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:30:55PM -0800, Prashant Malani wrote:
> Some Chrome OS devices with Embedded Controllers (EC) can read and
> modify Type C port state.
>
> Add an entry in the DT Bindings documentation that lists out the logical
> device and describes the relevant port information, to be used by the
> corresponding driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fixed license identifier.
> - Renamed "port" to "connector".
> - Made "connector" be a "usb-c-connector" compatible property.
> - Updated port-number description to explain min and max values,
> and removed $ref which was causing dt_binding_check errors.
> - Fixed power-role, data-role and try-power-role details to make
> dt_binding_check pass.
> - Fixed example to include parent EC SPI DT Node.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - No changes. Patch first introduced in v2 of series.
>
> .../bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000000..97fd982612f120
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Google Chrome OS EC(Embedded Controller) Type C port driver.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
> + - Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
> +
> +description:
> + Chrome OS devices have an Embedded Controller(EC) which has access to
> + Type C port state. This node is intended to allow the host to read and
> + control the Type C ports. The node for this device should be under a
> + cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: google,cros-ec-typec
> +
> + connector:
> + description: A node that represents a physical Type C connector port
> + on the device.
> + type: object
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: usb-c-connector
> + port-number:
> + description: The number used by the Chrome OS EC to identify
> + this type C port. Valid values are 0 - (EC_USB_PD_MAX_PORTS - 1).
> + power-role:
> + description: Determines the power role that the Type C port will
> + adopt.
> + maxItems: 1
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - sink
> + - source
> + - dual
> + data-role:
> + description: Determines the data role that the Type C port will
> + adopt.
> + maxItems: 1
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - host
> + - device
> + - dual
> + try-power-role:
> + description: Determines the preferred power role of the Type C port.
> + maxItems: 1
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - sink
> + - source
> + - dual
> +
> + required:
> + - port-number
> + - power-role
> + - data-role
> + - try-power-role
Do you really need to redefine those?
I think you just need to mention that there is a required sub-node
"connector", and the place where it's described. So something
like this:
Required sub-node:
- connector : The "usb-c-connector". The bindings of the
connector node are specified in:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
Then you just need to define the Chrome OS EC specific properties, so
I guess just the "port-number".
thanks,
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists