linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] usb: gadget: aspeed: read vhub properties from device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:29:32 -0800
From:   Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        taoren@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] usb: gadget: aspeed: read vhub properties from
 device tree

Hi Ben,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 03:09:01PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 15:03 -0800, rentao.bupt@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
> > 
> > The patch introduces 2 DT properties ("aspeed,vhub-downstream-ports" and
> > "aspeed,vhub-generic-endpoints") which replaces hardcoded port/endpoint
> > number. It is to make it more convenient to add support for newer vhub
> > revisions with different number of ports and endpoints.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> 
> With one minor nit that can be addressed in a subsequent patch (see
> below)
> 
> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>

Thanks for the help on the patch series.

> > -		if (istat & VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE3)
> > -			ast_vhub_dev_irq(&vhub->ports[2].dev);
> > -		if (istat & VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE4)
> > -			ast_vhub_dev_irq(&vhub->ports[3].dev);
> > -		if (istat & VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE5)
> > -			ast_vhub_dev_irq(&vhub->ports[4].dev);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < vhub->max_ports; i++) {
> > +		u32 dev_mask = VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE1 << i;
> > +
> > +		if (istat & dev_mask)
> > +			ast_vhub_dev_irq(&vhub->ports[i].dev);
> >  	}
> 
> The 2400 and 2500 have very slow cores and every cycle counts in that
> interrupt handler from my experience. I would sugggest you generate a
> "mask" of all the device interrupts for enabled ports in struct vhub
> and AND istat with that mask before going through the loop. Either that
> or use find_next_zero_bit...
> 
> I wouldn't gate merging this patch on this, it can be a subsequent
> refinement.

Got it. I will take care of the improvement in a follow-up patch.

Cheers,

Tao