[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200227225857.2339e365@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:58:57 +0100
From: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: add a script to check sysctl docs
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:37:10 -0700, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:34:42 +0100
> Stephen Kitt <steve@....org> wrote:
>
> > This script allows sysctl documentation to be checked against the
> > kernel source code, to identify missing or obsolete entries. Running
> > it against 5.5 shows for example that sysctl/kernel.rst has two
> > obsolete entries and is missing 52 entries.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > * drop UTF-8 characters
> > * fix license identifier
> > * fix example invocation to include path as well as table
> >
> > v2 was the initial submission (in v2 of the sysctl/kernel.rst patch
> > set).
>
> This seems like a useful thing to have, so I've applied it. It would be
> rather more useful, though, with a bit of ... wait for it ...
> documentation. Even just an example command line in the header comments
> would be a good place to start. Care to send a followup? :)
The committed script has this:
+# Example invocation:
+# scripts/check-sysctl-docs -vtable="kernel" \
+# Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst \
+# $(git grep -l register_sysctl_)
+#
+# Specify -vdebug=1 to see debugging information
but I agree that it needs more documentation ;-). In particular, I need to
explain what the script expects in terms of document layout...
Where would be the best place? In admin-guide/sysctl/index.rst, as a “how to
maintain these files” section, or in a separate document, or in the script
headers?
Regards,
Stephen
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists