[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200227235048.GA21304@plvision.eu>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:50:58 +0000
From: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@...ision.eu>,
Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@...ision.eu>,
Andrii Savka <andrii.savka@...ision.eu>,
Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>,
Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@...ision.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/3] net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver
for Prestera family ASIC device 98DX325x (AC3x)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:43:57PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Please be consistent. Make your prefixes, name, filenames the same.
> > > For example:
> > > prestera_driver_kind[] = "prestera";
> > >
> > > Applied to the whole code.
> > >
> > So you suggested to use prestera_ as a prefix, I dont see a problem
> > with that, but why not mvsw_pr_ ? So it has the vendor, device name parts
> > together as a key. Also it is necessary to apply prefix for the static
> > names ?
>
> Although static names don't cause linker issues, you do still see them
> in opps stack traces, etc. It just helps track down where the symbols
> come from, if they all have a prefix.
>
> Andrew
Sure, thanks, makes sense. But is it necessary that prefix should match
filenames too ? Would it be OK to use just 'mvpr_' instead of 'prestera_'
for funcs & types in this particular case ?
Regards,
Vadym Kochan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists