[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200227075058.GD5379@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:50:58 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to
v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 03:50:04PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
>
> On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> > > Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(),
> > > have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement
> > > notifier ops (bind, unbind).
> > >
> > > The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a
> > > call to v4l2_async_notifier_init().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
> > Instead of improving v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), could you convert
> > the users (IMX driver in this case) to call the preferred APIs instead?
>
> I presume you mean using v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(). Ok,
> I'll convert to use that API.
Thanks, Steve!
--
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists