[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5797dc75-4f93-77db-9a72-e138cb15a7df@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:39:14 +0800
From: "luobin (L)" <luobin9@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<aviad.krawczyk@...wei.com>, <luoxianjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] hinic: Fix a irq affinity bug
Hi David:
Thanks for your reply, we'll fix and resubmit.
On 2020/2/20 2:47, David Miller wrote:
> From: Luo bin <luobin9@...wei.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:40:12 +0000
>
>> do not use a local variable as an input parameter of irq_set_affinity_hint
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo bin <luobin9@...wei.com>
> Bug fixes should target 'net' instead of 'net-next'.
>
> Every patch series containing more than one patch should have an appropriate
> header posting.
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists