linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200227110713.GA5708@afzalpc>
Date:   Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:37:13 +0530
From:   afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach:
> 
>    - Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series
>      to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have
>      no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong
>      to.
> 
>    - After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into
>      linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along
>      with the removal of the core parts.
> 
> That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip
> irq/core branch as much as possible.

Okay, i will do accordingly.

[ your mail crossed my v3 (only one patch) posting ]

Regards
afzal