[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200227123314.mkg6jqai64b3paxw@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:33:14 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pwm: mediatek: add longer period support
Hello Sam,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:27:07PM +0800, Sam Shih wrote:
> > >
> > > + /* The pwm source clock can be divided by 2^clkdiv. When the clksel +
> > > * bit is set to 1, The final clock output needs to be divided by an + *
> > > extra 1625.
> > > + */
> >
> > I'd write:
> >
> > The source clock is divided by 2^clkdiv or iff the clksel bit is set by
> > 2^clkdiv + 1625.
> >
>
> Great, the comment is short and clear.
> But maybe change “2^clkdiv + 1625” to “the product of 2^clkdiv and 1625”
> is clearer ?
Writing a formula in words isn't helpful. If my formula was wrong use
the right one. I wrote
2^clkdiv + 1625
(which implicitly means (2^clkdiv) + 1625), if this is wrong write
2^clkdiv * 1625
or whatever is the right one then. And use parenthesis if you doubt
clearness.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists