[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200227130001.GA107011@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:00:01 +0000
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
morten.rasmussen@....com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/topology: Don't enable EAS on SMT systems
On Wednesday 26 Feb 2020 at 16:41:17 (+0000), Valentin Schneider wrote:
> EAS already requires asymmetric CPU capacities to be enabled, and mixing
> this with SMT is an aberration, but better be safe than sorry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Acked-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Thanks,
Quentin
> ---
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 00911884b7e7..76cd0a370b9a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -360,6 +360,10 @@ static bool build_perf_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
> goto free;
> }
>
> + /* EAS definitely does *not* handle SMT */
> + if (sched_smt_active())
> + goto free;
> +
> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> /* Skip already covered CPUs. */
> if (find_pd(pd, i))
> --
> 2.24.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists