linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] perf annotate/config: More fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200227131648.GF34774@krava>
Date:   Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:16:48 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
        xieyisheng1@...wei.com, alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com,
        treeze.taeung@...il.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        tmricht@...ux.ibm.com, namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
        songliubraving@...com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com,
        changbin.du@...el.com, leo.yan@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] perf annotate/config: More fixes

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:08:46AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:15:49PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:12:58PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> > > These are the additional set of fixes on top of previous series:
> > > http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200204045233.474937-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
> > > 
> > > Note for the last patch:
> > > I couldn't understand what intel-pt.cache-divisor is really used for.
> > > Adrian, can you please help.
> > > 
> > > Ravi Bangoria (8):
> > >   perf annotate/tui: Re-render title bar after switching back from
> > >     script browser
> > >   perf annotate: Fix --show-total-period for tui/stdio2
> > >   perf annotate: Fix --show-nr-samples for tui/stdio2
> > >   perf config: Introduce perf_config_u8()
> > >   perf annotate: Make perf config effective
> > >   perf annotate: Prefer cmdline option over default config
> > >   perf annotate: Fix perf config option description
> > >   perf config: Document missing config options
> > 
> > nice, I guess this all worked in the past but got broken because
> > we don't have any tests for annotation code.. any chance you could
> 
> I'm going thru them, can I take that "nice" as an Acked-by? Have you
> gone thru those patches?

nope, I just real fast checked on them.. I expected more discussion on tests ;-)

but as Ravi wrote, it could take some time

jirka

> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
> > think of some way to test annotations?
>  
> > perhaps some shell script, or prepare all the needed data for annotation
> > manualy.. sort of like we did in tests/hists_*.c
> > 
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> > 
> > > 
> > >  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-config.txt | 74 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c            |  4 +-
> > >  tools/perf/builtin-report.c              |  2 +-
> > >  tools/perf/builtin-top.c                 |  2 +-
> > >  tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c        | 19 +++--
> > >  tools/perf/util/annotate.c               | 89 +++++++++---------------
> > >  tools/perf/util/annotate.h               |  6 +-
> > >  tools/perf/util/config.c                 | 12 ++++
> > >  tools/perf/util/config.h                 |  1 +
> > >  9 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.24.1
> > > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> - Arnaldo
>