[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200227132137.irruicvlkxpdo3so@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:21:37 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Hellström (VMware)
<thomas_os@...pmail.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Guillaume.Gardet@....com,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
gurchetansingh@...omium.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, yuq825@...il.com,
noralf@...nnes.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/shmem: add support for per object caching
flags.
Hi,
> > So I'd like to push patches 1+2 to -fixes and sort everything else later
> > in -next. OK?
>
> OK with me.
Done.
>> [ context: why shmem helpers use pgprot_writecombine + pgprot_decrypted?
>> we get conflicting mappings because of that, linear kernel
>> map vs. gem object vmap/mmap ]
> Do we have any idea what drivers are actually using
> write-combine and decrypted?
drivers/gpu/drm# find -name Kconfig* -print | xargs grep -l DRM_GEM_SHMEM_HELPER
./lima/Kconfig
./tiny/Kconfig
./cirrus/Kconfig
./Kconfig
./panfrost/Kconfig
./udl/Kconfig
./v3d/Kconfig
./virtio/Kconfig
virtio needs cached.
cirrus+udl should be ok with cached too.
Not clue about the others (lima, tiny, panfrost, v3d). Maybe they use
write-combine just because this is what they got by default from
drm_gem_mmap_obj(). Maybe they actually need that. Trying to Cc:
maintainters (and drop stable@).
On decrypted: I guess that is only relevant for virtual machines, i.e.
virtio-gpu and cirrus?
virtio-gpu needs it, otherwise the host can't show the virtual display.
cirrus bounces everything via blits to vram, so it should be ok without
decrypted. I guess that implies we should make decrypted configurable.
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists