[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB362462D69BEA6CC2EEA42A64F2E80@BYAPR11MB3624.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:33:30 +0000
From: "Kammela, Gayatri" <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Somayaji, Vishwanath" <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Prestopine, Charles D" <charles.d.prestopine@...el.com>,
Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>,
"Box, David E" <david.e.box@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Make
pmc_core_lpm_display() generic for platforms that support sub-states
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 2:06 AM
> To: Kammela, Gayatri <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
> Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> Somayaji, Vishwanath <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>;
> dvhart@...radead.org; Westerberg, Mika <mika.westerberg@...el.com>;
> peterz@...radead.org; Prestopine, Charles D
> <charles.d.prestopine@...el.com>; Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>;
> Box, David E <david.e.box@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Make
> pmc_core_lpm_display() generic for platforms that support sub-states
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 03:29:14PM -0800, Gayatri Kammela wrote:
> > Currently pmc_core_lpm_display() uses array of struct pointers i.e.,
> > tgl_lpm_maps for Tiger Lake directly to iterate through and to get the
> > number of status/live status registers which is hardcoded and cannot
> > be re-used for future platforms that support sub-states. To maintain
> > readability, make pmc_core_lpm_display() generic, so that it can
> > re-used for future platforms.
>
> This patch need more work, see below.
> That said, I would prefer to see it last in the series for next version.
Sure, I will put this patch last in the series in v3.
>
> ...
>
> > + lpm_regs = kmalloc_array(arr_size, sizeof(*lpm_regs), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> No error check?
> Besides that it is obvious memory leak.
Sorry my bad, I will put the check and free the memory. I will update this in v3
>
> > + for (index = 0; maps[index]; index++) {
> > lpm_regs[index] = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, offset);
> > offset += 4;
> > }
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists