[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7800e98e3688c124ac3672284b87d67321e1c29e.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:21:38 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
rientjes@...gle.com, aarcange@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm,thp,compaction,cma: allow THP migration for
CMA allocations
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 15:41 -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 2/27/20 1:32 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -8253,14 +8253,19 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct
> > zone *zone, struct page *page,
> >
> > /*
> > * Hugepages are not in LRU lists, but they're movable.
> > + * THPs are on the LRU, but need to be counted as
> > #small pages.
> > * We need not scan over tail pages because we don't
> > * handle each tail page individually in migration.
> > */
> > - if (PageHuge(page)) {
> > + if (PageHuge(page) || PageTransCompound(page)) {
> > struct page *head = compound_head(page);
> > unsigned int skip_pages;
> >
> > - if
> > (!hugepage_migration_supported(page_hstate(head)))
> > + if (PageHuge(page) &&
> > + !hugepage_migration_supported(page_hstate(h
> > ead)))
> > + return page;
> > +
> > + if (!PageLRU(head) && !__PageMovable(head))
>
> Pretty sure this is going to be true for hugetlb pages. So, this
> will change
> behavior and make all hugetlb pages look unmovable. Perhaps, only
> check this
> condition for THP pages?
Does that need to be the following, then?
if (PageTransHuge(head) && !PageHuge(page) && !PageLRU(head) &&
!__PageMovable(head))
return page;
That's an easy one liner I would be happy to send in
if everybody agrees that should fix things :)
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists