[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200228195639.GL23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 19:56:39 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Minimize uaccess exposure in
i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl()
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 07:04:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 07:03:42PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > And why not mark gen8_canonical_addr() __always_inline?
> >
> > Right, marking those two functions as __always_inline is the other
> > option. The problem is, if you keep doing it, eventually you end up
> > with __always_inline-itis spreading all over the place. And it affects
> > all the other callers, at least in the CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE case.
> > At least this fix is localized.
>
> I'm all for __always_inline in this case, the compiler not inlining sign
> extention is just retarded,
FWIW, in this case it's
salq $8, %rax
sarq $8, %rax
i.e. 8 bytes. Sure, that's 3 bytes longer than call, but really, WTF?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists