[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd3f06814b4319ddaaee2bf142aaf465@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 19:54:04 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/debugfs: add new config option for trigger
interrupt from userspace
On 2020-02-28 19:13, Joe Jin wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On 2/28/20 8:37 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2020-02-28 05:42, Joe Jin wrote:
>>> commit 536e2e34bd00 ("genirq/debugfs: Triggering of interrupts from
>>> userspace") is allowed developer inject interrupts via irq debugfs,
>>> which
>>> is very useful during development phase, but on a production system,
>>> this
>>> is very dangerous, add new config option, developers can enable it as
>>> needed instead of enabling it by default when irq debugfs is enabled.
>>
>> I don't really mind the patch (although it could be more elegant), but
>> in
>> general I object to most debugfs options being set on a production
>> kernel.
>> There is way too much information in most debugfs backends to be
>> comfortable
>> with it, and you can find things like page table dumps, for example...
>
> We should not enable any debug option on production system, actual
> customer
> want to resize their BM or VM, cpu offline may lead system not works
> properly,
> and if we knew more details of IRQ info it will be very help to
> identify
> if it caused by IRQ/vectors, this is the motivation of we want to
> enable it
> on production kernel.
If something doesn't work properly, then you are still debugging,
AFAICT.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists