[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd163b7f-0a12-6f99-942b-a098551b3354@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:01:37 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] soundwire: intel: transition to
sdw_master_device/driver support
On 2/28/20 1:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:32:00PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> +static struct sdw_master_driver intel_sdw_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "intel-master",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> Nit, setting .owner isn't needed anymore, as the core code handles this
> for you, right?
Ah, yes indeed, the following code takes care of it. Thanks for spotting
this!
I can remove this assignment in a follow-up patch if that's alright with
Vinod.
+#define sdw_register_master_driver(drv) \
+ __sdw_register_master_driver(drv, THIS_MODULE)
+/**
+ * __sdw_register_master_driver() - register a SoundWire Master driver
+ * @mdrv: 'Master driver' to register
+ * @owner: owning module/driver
+ *
+ * Return: zero on success, else a negative error code.
+ */
+int __sdw_register_master_driver(struct sdw_master_driver *mdrv,
+ struct module *owner)
+{
+ mdrv->driver.bus = &sdw_bus_type;
+
+ if (!mdrv->probe) {
+ pr_err("driver %s didn't provide SDW probe routine\n",
+ mdrv->driver.name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ mdrv->driver.owner = owner;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists