linux-kernel - Re: [RFC net-next 1/3] net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver for Prestera family ASIC device 98DX325x (AC3x)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 07:36:23 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@...ision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
        Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@...ision.eu>,
        Andrii Savka <andrii.savka@...ision.eu>,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>,
        Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@...ision.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/3] net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver
 for Prestera family ASIC device 98DX325x (AC3x)

Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 12:50:58AM CET, vadym.kochan@...ision.eu wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:43:57PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > > Please be consistent. Make your prefixes, name, filenames the same.
>> > > For example:
>> > > prestera_driver_kind[] = "prestera";
>> > > 
>> > > Applied to the whole code.
>> > > 
>> > So you suggested to use prestera_ as a prefix, I dont see a problem
>> > with that, but why not mvsw_pr_ ? So it has the vendor, device name parts
>> > together as a key. Also it is necessary to apply prefix for the static
>> > names ?
>> 
>> Although static names don't cause linker issues, you do still see them
>> in opps stack traces, etc. It just helps track down where the symbols
>> come from, if they all have a prefix.
>> 
>>      Andrew
>
>Sure, thanks, makes sense. But is it necessary that prefix should match
>filenames too ? Would it be OK to use just 'mvpr_' instead of 'prestera_'

I would vote for "prestera_". It is clean, consistent, obvious.


>for funcs & types in this particular case ?
>
>Regards,
>Vadym Kochan