[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200228094903.g7yf73mtnbjyu4ez@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:49:03 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Hellström (VMware)
<thomas_os@...pmail.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Guillaume.Gardet@....com,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
gurchetansingh@...omium.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, yuq825@...il.com,
noralf@...nnes.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/shmem: add support for per object caching
flags.
Hi,
> > Not clue about the others (lima, tiny, panfrost, v3d). Maybe they use
> > write-combine just because this is what they got by default from
> > drm_gem_mmap_obj(). Maybe they actually need that. Trying to Cc:
> > maintainters (and drop stable@).
> > virtio-gpu needs it, otherwise the host can't show the virtual display.
> > cirrus bounces everything via blits to vram, so it should be ok without
> > decrypted. I guess that implies we should make decrypted configurable.
>
> Decrypted here is clearly incorrect and violates the SEV spec, regardless of
> a config option.
>
> The only correct way is currently to use dma_alloc_coherent() and
> mmap_coherent() to allocate decrypted memory and then use the
> pgprot_decrypted flag.
Hmm, virtio-gpu uses the dma api to allow the host access the gem
object. So I think I have to correct the statement above, if I
understands things correctly the dma api will use (properly allocated)
decrypted bounce buffers and the virtio-gpu shmem objects don't need
pgprot_decrypted mappings.
That leaves the question what to do about pgprot_writecombine(). Any
comments from the driver maintainers (see first paragraph)?
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists