[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOFY-A0an+H=aP6vANr17rrv7v5F99azi4UVaYNTAcpRSRsHUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:34:48 -0800
From: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 1:28 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Arjun,
>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:50:51 -0800 Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:57 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds good, thanks. I'll cook up a patch and send it along.
>
> You will need to keep the sparc64 patch to correct pte_index in this case.
>
Agreed on sparc64; I think the sparc32 patch ought to be reverted,
though (since pte_index may be meaningless to it).
Thanks,
-Arjun
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists