linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] MIPS: pic32mzda: Drop pointless static qualifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 12:45:44 +0100
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     ralf@...ux-mips.org, paulburton@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        sboyd@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be, f4bug@...at.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] MIPS: pic32mzda: Drop pointless static qualifier

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 07:05:02AM +0000, YueHaibing wrote:
> There is no need to have the 'struct device_node *node' variable static
> since new value always be assigned before use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
>  arch/mips/pic32/pic32mzda/time.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]