[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200228140143.GA30654@embeddedor>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:01:43 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH][next] af_unix: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
include/net/af_unix.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
index 17e10fba2152..e51d727cc3cd 100644
--- a/include/net/af_unix.h
+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct unix_address {
refcount_t refcnt;
int len;
unsigned int hash;
- struct sockaddr_un name[0];
+ struct sockaddr_un name[];
};
struct unix_skb_parms {
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists