lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP8wYvmngMCig3nJg45J93D2Ah=m3J91YpgRZ9hhscLe6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:13:30 +0100
From:   Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Sage Weil <sage@...hat.co>,
        Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libceph: follow redirect replies from osds

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:01 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 12:46 +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Static analysis with Coverity has detected a potential issue in the
> > following commit in function ceph_redirect_decode():
> >
> > commit 205ee1187a671c3b067d7f1e974903b44036f270
> > Author: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@...tank.com>
> > Date:   Mon Jan 27 17:40:20 2014 +0200
> >
> >     libceph: follow redirect replies from osds
> >
> > The issue is as follows:
> >
> >
> > 3486        len = ceph_decode_32(p);
> >
> > Unused value (UNUSED_VALUE)
> > assigned_pointer: Assigning value from len to *p here, but that stored
> > value is overwritten before it can be used.
> >
> > 3487        *p += len; /* skip osd_instructions */
> > 3488
> > 3489        /* skip the rest */
> >
> > value_overwrite: Overwriting previous write to *p with value from
> > struct_end.
> >
> > 3490        *p = struct_end;
> >
> > The *p assignment in line 3487 is effectively being overwritten by the
> > *p assignment in 3490.  Maybe the following is correct:
> >
> >         len = ceph_decode_32(p);
> > -       p += len; /* skip osd_instructions */
> > +       struct_end = *p + len;  /* skip osd_instructions */
> >
> >         /* skip the rest */
> >         *p = struct_end;
> >
> > I'm not familiar with the ceph structure here, so I'm not sure what the
> > correct fix would be.
> >
>
> Probably something like this? (untested, of course)
>
> ----------------------
>
> [PATCH] libceph: fix up Coverity warning in ceph_redirect_decode
>
> We're going to skip to the end of the msg after checking the
> object_name anyway, so there is no need to separately decode
> the osd instructions that follow it.
>
> Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
>  net/ceph/osd_client.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> index 8ff2856e2d52..51810db4130a 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> @@ -3483,9 +3483,6 @@ static int ceph_redirect_decode(void **p, void
> *end,
>                 goto e_inval;
>         }
>
> -       len = ceph_decode_32(p);
> -       *p += len; /* skip osd_instructions */
> -
>         /* skip the rest */
>         *p = struct_end;
>  out:

Yeah, I have had the same patch in a local branch here since last year:

https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg2092861.html

I'll make sure to push it out this time ;)

Thanks,

                Ilya

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ