lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 07:39:51 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> Cc: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] fs/dcache: Limit # of negative dentries On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:32:02AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > On 2/27/20 10:34 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > The canonical argument in favour of negative dentries is to improve > > application startup time as every application searches the library path ^^^^^^^ > > for the same libraries. Only they don't do that any more: ^^^^^^^^^ > > It is the shell that does the path search, not the command itself.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists