linux-kernel - [PATCH v11 07/11] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200228000105.165012-8-thgarnie@chromium.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:00:52 -0800
From:   Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org>
To:     kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc:     kristen@...ux.intel.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v11 07/11] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support

Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the
kernel to be PIE compatible.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
index c8daa92f38dc..8e221285d9f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 	 * Hooray, we are in Long 64-bit mode (but still running in low memory)
 	 */
 SYM_FUNC_START(wakeup_long64)
-	movq	saved_magic, %rax
+	movq	saved_magic(%rip), %rax
 	movq	$0x123456789abcdef0, %rdx
 	cmpq	%rdx, %rax
 	je	2f
@@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(wakeup_long64)
 	movw	%ax, %es
 	movw	%ax, %fs
 	movw	%ax, %gs
-	movq	saved_rsp, %rsp
+	movq	saved_rsp(%rip), %rsp
 
-	movq	saved_rbx, %rbx
-	movq	saved_rdi, %rdi
-	movq	saved_rsi, %rsi
-	movq	saved_rbp, %rbp
+	movq	saved_rbx(%rip), %rbx
+	movq	saved_rdi(%rip), %rdi
+	movq	saved_rsi(%rip), %rsi
+	movq	saved_rbp(%rip), %rbp
 
-	movq	saved_rip, %rax
+	movq	saved_rip(%rip), %rax
 	jmp	*%rax
 SYM_FUNC_END(wakeup_long64)
 
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(do_suspend_lowlevel)
 	xorl	%eax, %eax
 	call	save_processor_state
 
-	movq	$saved_context, %rax
+	leaq	saved_context(%rip), %rax
 	movq	%rsp, pt_regs_sp(%rax)
 	movq	%rbp, pt_regs_bp(%rax)
 	movq	%rsi, pt_regs_si(%rax)
@@ -67,13 +67,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(do_suspend_lowlevel)
 	pushfq
 	popq	pt_regs_flags(%rax)
 
-	movq	$.Lresume_point, saved_rip(%rip)
+	leaq	.Lresume_point(%rip), %rax
+	movq	%rax, saved_rip(%rip)
 
-	movq	%rsp, saved_rsp
-	movq	%rbp, saved_rbp
-	movq	%rbx, saved_rbx
-	movq	%rdi, saved_rdi
-	movq	%rsi, saved_rsi
+	movq	%rsp, saved_rsp(%rip)
+	movq	%rbp, saved_rbp(%rip)
+	movq	%rbx, saved_rbx(%rip)
+	movq	%rdi, saved_rdi(%rip)
+	movq	%rsi, saved_rsi(%rip)
 
 	addq	$8, %rsp
 	movl	$3, %edi
@@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(do_suspend_lowlevel)
 	.align 4
 .Lresume_point:
 	/* We don't restore %rax, it must be 0 anyway */
-	movq	$saved_context, %rax
+	leaq	saved_context(%rip), %rax
 	movq	saved_context_cr4(%rax), %rbx
 	movq	%rbx, %cr4
 	movq	saved_context_cr3(%rax), %rbx
-- 
2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog