[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsGgjnyZiB+ionfnnk+_e+5oaC-5nmGq+mLxWs1RcwsPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:24:23 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@...waw.pl>,
util-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] VFS: Filesystem information and notifications [ver #17]
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:27 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Superblocks and mounts could get enumerated by a unique identifier.
> > mnt_id seems to be good for mounts, s_dev may or may not be good for
> > superblock, but s_id (as introduced in this patchset) could be used
> > instead.
>
> So what would the sysfs tree look like with this?
For a start something like this:
mounts/$MOUNT_ID/
parent -> ../$PARENT_ID
super -> ../../supers/$SUPER_ID
root: path from mount root to fs root (could be optional as usually
they are the same)
mountpoint -> $MOUNTPOINT
flags: mount flags
propagation: mount propagation
children/$CHILD_ID -> ../../$CHILD_ID
supers/$SUPER_ID/
type: fstype
source: mount source (devname)
options: csv of mount options
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists