linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] arm: dts: vf: toradex: re-license GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f38ae95378debf708924392c88a7723c1e702c4.camel@toradex.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:54:04 +0000
From:   Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
To:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "igor.opaniuk@...il.com" <igor.opaniuk@...il.com>
CC:     Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@...adex.com>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Igor Opanyuk <igor.opanyuk@...adex.com>,
        Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@...adex.com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] arm: dts: vf: toradex: re-license GPL-2.0+ to
 GPL-2.0

Hi Igor

On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 19:32 +0200, Igor Opaniuk wrote:
> From: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@...adex.com>
> 
> Specify explicitly that GPL-2.0 license can be used and not
> GPL-2.0+ (which also includes next less permissive versions of GPL)
> in Toradex i.MX7-based SoM device trees.

NAK, please drop this one. Due to dual licensing permissiveness of GPL
really should not matter.

Thanks!

Cheers

Marcel