lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200229124147.GA27151@afzalpc>
Date:   Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:11:47 +0530
From:   afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/18] m68k: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

Hi Finn,

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 09:38:20AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:

> If you want to stop the compiler complaining about an unchecked return 
> value, assuming that it does so, please consider using
> 
> 	if (request_irq(...))
> 		pr_debug(...);
> 
> That way there is no penalty paid for adding error messages that the 
> original author apparently did not want.

Okay

Regards
afzal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ