linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/jbd2: fix data races at struct journal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200229184023.GE7378@mit.edu>
Date:   Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:40:23 -0500
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/jbd2: fix data races at struct journal_head

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:10:51AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 21-02-20 23:31:11, Qian Cai wrote:
> > journal_head::b_transaction and journal_head::b_next_transaction could
> > be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,
> > 
> >  LTP: starting fsync04
> >  /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev
> >  EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem
> >  EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
> >  ==================================================================
> >  BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer [jbd2] / jbd2_write_access_granted [jbd2]
> > 
> >  write to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25721 on cpu 70:
> >   __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0xdd/0x210 [jbd2]
> >   __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2569
> >   jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x2d15/0x3f20 [jbd2]
> >   (inlined by) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction at fs/jbd2/commit.c:1034
> >   kjournald2+0x13b/0x450 [jbd2]
> >   kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0
> >   ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
> > 
> >  read to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25724 on cpu 68:
> >   jbd2_write_access_granted+0x1b2/0x250 [jbd2]
> >   jbd2_write_access_granted at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1155
> >   jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x60 [jbd2]
> >   __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x50/0x90 [ext4]
> >   ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x158/0x620 [ext4]
> >   ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x54f/0xca0 [ext4]
> >   ext4_ind_map_blocks+0xc79/0x1b40 [ext4]
> >   ext4_map_blocks+0x3b4/0x950 [ext4]
> >   _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4]
> >   ext4_get_block+0x3b/0x50 [ext4]
> >   __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0
> >   __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50
> >   ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4]
> >   generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290
> >   ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
> >   ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
> >   new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
> >   __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
> >   vfs_write+0x103/0x260
> >   ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
> >   __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
> >   do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05
> >   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> > 
> >  5 locks held by fsync04/25724:
> >   #0: ffff99f9911093f8 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x21c/0x260
> >   #1: ffff99f9db4c0348 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}, at: ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x65/0x210 [ext4]
> >   #2: ffff99f5e7dfcf58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2]
> >   #3: ffff99f9db4c0168 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++}, at: ext4_map_blocks+0x176/0x950 [ext4]
> >   #4: ffffffff99086b40 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x4e/0x250 [jbd2]
> >  irq event stamp: 1407125
> >  hardirqs last  enabled at (1407125): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790
> >  hardirqs last disabled at (1407124): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790
> >  softirqs last  enabled at (1405528): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c
> >  softirqs last disabled at (1405521): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0
> > 
> >  Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
> >  CPU: 68 PID: 25724 Comm: fsync04 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7
> >  Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019
> > 
> > The plain reads are outside of jh->b_state_lock critical section which result
> > in data races. Fix them by adding pairs of READ|WRITE_ONCE().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> 
> Yeah, makes sense. You can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

Thanks, applied.

				- Ted