[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gR1+NaWzteqNKip=cYk89oEVW18HNao7Xv=JipzzDagw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:44:19 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Badger <ebadger@...aio.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Add pgprot_t to mhp_params
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:25 AM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
>
> devm_memremap_pages() is currently used by the PCI P2PDMA code to create
> struct page mappings for IO memory. At present, these mappings are created
> with PAGE_KERNEL which implies setting the PAT bits to be WB. However, on
> x86, an mtrr register will typically override this and force the cache
> type to be UC-. In the case firmware doesn't set this register it is
> effectively WB and will typically result in a machine check exception
> when it's accessed.
>
> Other arches are not currently likely to function correctly seeing they
> don't have any MTRR registers to fall back on.
>
> To solve this, provide a way to specify the pgprot value explicitly to
> arch_add_memory().
>
> Of the arches that support MEMORY_HOTPLUG: x86_64, and arm64 need a simple
> change to pass the pgprot_t down to their respective functions which set
> up the page tables. For x86_32, set the page tables explicitly using
> _set_memory_prot() (seeing they are already mapped). For ia64, s390 and
> sh, reject anything but PAGE_KERNEL settings -- this should be fine,
> for now, seeing these architectures don't support ZONE_DEVICE.
>
> A check in __add_pages() is also added to ensure the pgprot parameter was
> set for all arches.
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 3 ++-
> arch/ia64/mm/init.c | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 3 ++-
> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 3 +++
> arch/sh/mm/init.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 2 ++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 ++++-
> mm/memremap.c | 6 +++---
> 10 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index ee37bca8aba8..ea3fa844a8a2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1058,7 +1058,8 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
>
> __create_pgd_mapping(swapper_pg_dir, start, __phys_to_virt(start),
> - size, PAGE_KERNEL, __pgd_pgtable_alloc, flags);
> + size, params->pgprot, __pgd_pgtable_alloc,
> + flags);
>
> memblock_clear_nomap(start, size);
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> index 97bbc23ea1e3..d637b4ea3147 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> @@ -676,6 +676,9 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> int ret;
>
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->pgprot.pgprot != PAGE_KERNEL.pgprot))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> ret = __add_pages(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, params);
> if (ret)
> printk("%s: Problem encountered in __add_pages() as ret=%d\n",
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> index 19b1da5d7eca..832412bc7fad 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ int __ref arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> resize_hpt_for_hotplug(memblock_phys_mem_size());
>
> start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
> - rc = create_section_mapping(start, start + size, nid, PAGE_KERNEL);
> + rc = create_section_mapping(start, start + size, nid,
> + params->pgprot);
> if (rc) {
> pr_warn("Unable to create mapping for hot added memory 0x%llx..0x%llx: %d\n",
> start, start + size, rc);
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> index e9e4a7abd0cc..87b2d024e75a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> @@ -277,6 +277,9 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->altmap))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->pgprot.pgprot != PAGE_KERNEL.pgprot))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> rc = vmem_add_mapping(start, size);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index e5114c053364..b9de2d4fa57e 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,9 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> int ret;
>
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->pgprot.pgprot != PAGE_KERNEL.pgprot)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* We only have ZONE_NORMAL, so this is easy.. */
> ret = __add_pages(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, params);
> if (unlikely(ret))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> index e25a4218e6ff..96d8e4fb1cc8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> @@ -858,6 +858,11 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> {
> unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = _set_memory_prot(start, nr_pages, params->pgprot);
Perhaps a comment since it's not immediately obvious where the
PAGE_KERNEL prot was established, and perhaps add a conditional to
skip this call in the param->pgprot == PAGE_KERNEL case?
Other than that looks good to me, but only an ack since I'm only
testing the x86 changes.
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists