linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: use assembly mnemonics for VFP register access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:58:40 +0100
From:   Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:     linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, manojgupta@...gle.com, jiancai@...gle.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: use assembly mnemonics for VFP register access

On 2020-02-21 07:34, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Clang's integrated assembler does not allow to to use the mcr
> instruction to access floating point co-processor registers:
> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:342:2: error: invalid operand for instruction
>         fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc &
> ~(FPEXC_EX|FPEXC_DEX|FPEXC_FP2V|FPEXC_VV|FPEXC_TRAP_MASK));
>         ^
> arch/arm/vfp/vfpinstr.h:79:6: note: expanded from macro 'fmxr'
>         asm("mcr p10, 7, %0, " vfpreg(_vfp_) ", cr0, 0 @ fmxr   "
> #_vfp_ ", %0" \
>             ^
> <inline asm>:1:6: note: instantiated into assembly here
>         mcr p10, 7, r0, cr8, cr0, 0 @ fmxr      FPEXC, r0
>             ^
> 
> The GNU assembler supports the .fpu directive at least since 2.17 (when
> documentation has been added). Since Linux requires binutils 2.21 it is
> safe to use .fpu directive. Use the .fpu directive and mnemonics for VFP
> register access.
> 
> This allows to build vfpmodule.c with Clang and its integrated assembler.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/905
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> ---
>  arch/arm/vfp/vfpinstr.h | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpinstr.h b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpinstr.h
> index 38dc154e39ff..799ccf065406 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpinstr.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpinstr.h
> @@ -62,21 +62,17 @@
>  #define FPSCR_C (1 << 29)
>  #define FPSCR_V	(1 << 28)
>  
> -/*
> - * Since we aren't building with -mfpu=vfp, we need to code
> - * these instructions using their MRC/MCR equivalents.
> - */
> -#define vfpreg(_vfp_) #_vfp_
> -
>  #define fmrx(_vfp_) ({			\
>  	u32 __v;			\
> -	asm("mrc p10, 7, %0, " vfpreg(_vfp_) ", cr0, 0 @ fmrx	%0, " #_vfp_	\
> +	asm(".fpu	vfpv2\n"	\
> +	    "vmrs	%0, " #_vfp_	\
>  	    : "=r" (__v) : : "cc");	\
>  	__v;				\
>   })
>  
>  #define fmxr(_vfp_,_var_)		\
> -	asm("mcr p10, 7, %0, " vfpreg(_vfp_) ", cr0, 0 @ fmxr	" #_vfp_ ", %0"	\
> +	asm(".fpu	vfpv2\n"	\
> +	    "vmsr	" #_vfp_ ", %0"	\
>  	   : : "r" (_var_) : "cc")
>  
>  u32 vfp_single_cpdo(u32 inst, u32 fpscr);

I just found out that this fails with binutils 2.23.1. Since we support
binutils back to 2.21 I guess that is not OK..?

  CC      arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.o
/tmp/cc2Vcw98.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc2Vcw98.s:920: Error: operand 1 must be a VFP extension System
Register -- `vmrs r6,FPINST'
/tmp/cc2Vcw98.s:948: Error: operand 1 must be a VFP extension System
Register -- `vmrs r6,FPINST2'

Looking into binutils history reveals that FPINST/FPINST2 has been
allowed with 16d02dc907c5717b5f47076bb90ae3795e73b59f
("gas/config/tc-arm.c (do_vmrs): Accept all control registers") which
made it into binutils 2.24...

I don't have a particular good idea how to make this work for Clang and
GCC other than a some ifdef's...

--
Stefan