[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3089122.gegXmbq47i@phil>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 01:02:06 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, dianders@...omium.org
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: fix Rockchip rk3399-evb bindings
Hi Johan,
Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2020, 14:28:36 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> Hi Robin,
>
> When I look at the review process of rk3399-evb.dts
> it is mentioned here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/672327/
>
> >> + model = "Rockchip RK3399 Evaluation Board";
> >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-evb", "rockchip,rk3399",
> >> + "google,rk3399evb-rev2", google,rk3399evb-rev1",
> >> + "google,rk3399evb-rev0" ;
> >
> > can you check against which compatibles that coreboot really matches?
> >
> > As we said that the evb changed between rev1 and rev2, I would expect the
> > compatible to be something like
> >
> > compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-evb", "google,rk3399evb-rev2",
> > "rockchip,rk3399";
> >
> > leaving out the rev1 and rev0
>
> The consensus in version 4 ends in what is shown in the dts file, so I
> changed it in rockchip.yaml. Things from the past maybe can better be
> explained by Heiko. Please advise if this patch needs to change and in
> what file.
Just get rid of the "google,rk3399evb-rev2" from the .dts please :-) .
(1) "rockchip,rk3399-evb", "rockchip,rk3399", "google,rk3399evb-rev2";
is just wrong for the reasons Robin explained, I guess that slipped
through review at the time.
(2) "google,rk3399evb-rev2" was a specific variant for Google I'm pretty
sure they'll have scraped all these boards directly after they had the
first actual rk3399-gru development devices
So I'm pretty sure the only rk3399-evbs in existence are the general ones.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists